Work Room - Week 14
Feb. 15th, 2011 10:18 pmThere is a Results thread: http://community.livejournal.com/therealljidol/428444.html
a Second Chance Idol announcement: http://community.livejournal.com/therealljidol/428754.html
and a new topic http://community.livejournal.com/therealljidol/428897.html
Tuesday nights are busy here in Idol!
We also have the Work Room.
I've said this before (and I will likely say this again knowing me) this is your space to hash out ideas and thoughts about writing in general.
Last week we will lucky enough to have
alexpgp stop in as a Guest Mentor. I hope everyone enjoyed that.
This week - well, we have another treat. Someone else who has been there, done that - from a different perspective, and I know she has a lot to say and share.
Again, you know her - you love her.
Arguably, the hardest working contestant in Idol history (I think making sure that you have a wifi connection in your recovery room so that immediately after giving birth you can get out an entry - thankfully she didn't have to do that - qualifies you for that title)
alycewilson!!
***
Good evening/morning/afternoon, class (depending on when you're reading this)!
My name is (WRITES ON THE BOARD)
alycewilson, but you can call me Alyce, or Miss Alyce if you're nasty (or under 6 years old, or non-human). You can find out more about me (and my books, including my recent collection, The Art of Life which includes some pieces I wrote for LJ Idol seasons 5 and 6) at my home page. I will be your mentor this week. Your regular instructor, Mr. Gary, has left me a few notes, but (FLINGS THEM OUT THE WINDOW) we're going to just wing it, OK?
Actually, that's not entirely true. First of all, Mr. Gary didn't give me any notes (and if he had I wouldn't have thrown them out the window), but he did give me an idea of what he'd like me to do. Secondly, I do have more than a gut instinct when it comes to helping to shape writing. I don't usually do this, but permit me to whip something out (PULLS OUT HER MFA IN POETRY) -- who's giggling back there??? Anyway, while studying for my master's in poetry writing, I participated in many workshops in both poetry and fiction. I also taught an Intro to Poetry course for underclassmen at Penn State while pursuing my master's. In addition, I've often provided constructive feedback to contributors to my online literary quarterly, Wild Violet.
As I've learned from those workshops, the most productive way to give feedback is to focus on key elements. I won't be overwhelming you by correcting every grammatical error or spelling mistake. Instead, I'll be evaluating what I think the piece is trying to do and how well it does it. Then I'll give you feedback designed to help you make it better.
In addition, I'll make myself available for brainstorming or any other questions related to writing, poetry, or the nuances of baby language (in which I am becoming quite proficient, thanks to my 8-month-old). I apologize in advance for the fact that I may need to pause while answering a question in order to handle a diaper change, and I hope you don't mind if your papers are returned with baby drool on them.
a Second Chance Idol announcement: http://community.livejournal.com/therealljidol/428754.html
and a new topic http://community.livejournal.com/therealljidol/428897.html
Tuesday nights are busy here in Idol!
We also have the Work Room.
I've said this before (and I will likely say this again knowing me) this is your space to hash out ideas and thoughts about writing in general.
Last week we will lucky enough to have
This week - well, we have another treat. Someone else who has been there, done that - from a different perspective, and I know she has a lot to say and share.
Again, you know her - you love her.
Arguably, the hardest working contestant in Idol history (I think making sure that you have a wifi connection in your recovery room so that immediately after giving birth you can get out an entry - thankfully she didn't have to do that - qualifies you for that title)
***
Good evening/morning/afternoon, class (depending on when you're reading this)!
My name is (WRITES ON THE BOARD)
Actually, that's not entirely true. First of all, Mr. Gary didn't give me any notes (and if he had I wouldn't have thrown them out the window), but he did give me an idea of what he'd like me to do. Secondly, I do have more than a gut instinct when it comes to helping to shape writing. I don't usually do this, but permit me to whip something out (PULLS OUT HER MFA IN POETRY) -- who's giggling back there??? Anyway, while studying for my master's in poetry writing, I participated in many workshops in both poetry and fiction. I also taught an Intro to Poetry course for underclassmen at Penn State while pursuing my master's. In addition, I've often provided constructive feedback to contributors to my online literary quarterly, Wild Violet.
As I've learned from those workshops, the most productive way to give feedback is to focus on key elements. I won't be overwhelming you by correcting every grammatical error or spelling mistake. Instead, I'll be evaluating what I think the piece is trying to do and how well it does it. Then I'll give you feedback designed to help you make it better.
In addition, I'll make myself available for brainstorming or any other questions related to writing, poetry, or the nuances of baby language (in which I am becoming quite proficient, thanks to my 8-month-old). I apologize in advance for the fact that I may need to pause while answering a question in order to handle a diaper change, and I hope you don't mind if your papers are returned with baby drool on them.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 03:46 am (UTC)I wouldn't notice the baby drool. I see enough of it here that I'm now blind to it. I'm wondering if we'll see some more poetry this week with your assistance. It won't be from me, mind you, but perhaps from other brave folk.
I need to sleep on the topic and then try to pick my best idea/angle. I'm already imagining I'll be reading a lot of entries about eggs.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 04:11 am (UTC)Sleeping on the topic is always a great idea. Good luck!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 04:39 am (UTC)I'm home gaming it now but still like reading what is happening in the work room. Ok, off to see what the topic is. Something about eggs I hear? Hummm!
no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 05:14 am (UTC)I'm glad Gary asked me. I'm happy for the chance to coach from the sidelines.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 02:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 04:10 pm (UTC)In addition, keep in mind that fiction entries compete against personal stories in this competition, which provides both challenges and opportunities. On the one hand, fiction must compete with the emotional impact of a personal story. In order to do so effectively, the fiction story must make an impact on the reader, as well. The advantage is that, unlike non-fiction, you get to create your entire world. You develop a setting, characters, and plot that are to your liking. Maybe this is also why LJI voters can sometimes be more critical of fiction: they know that all the details are created, so they expect more cohesion, more effective storytelling, whereas they may be more permissive of a meandering personal story.
That said, I think that fiction, if done well, can be a great choice. Where are you thinking of taking it?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 04:14 pm (UTC)Do you (oh great mentor, or anyone reading) have any pointers for maintaining voice in an unfamiliar style, setting, or circumstance?
no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 04:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 05:15 pm (UTC)As far as your question about voice in an unfamiliar style, setting or circumstance is concerned, I would say the first thing you need to do is become more familiar with your setting. Some authors like to sit down and write out details of their setting, characters, etc. ahead of time, to become more familiar with them. This could come in the form of freewriting (writing whatever comes to mind, without editorial constraint) or by playing a sort of improv game, where you ask yourself questions and answer as the character. These details may not actually come into the piece, but your knowledge of the character will inform it.
Of course, you can get to the same place by a more intuitive form of writing. Alice Walker claimed to have channeled her characters from "A Color Purple", almost like a medium, allowing them to speak through her words. I would argue that Walker probably had a good internal feel for who each of those characters was ahead of time, even though she might not have put it down in note form.
Of course, if the voice you're writing in is very different from your own (for example, clinical and detached, whereas you might personally be more emotional), it can be harder to maintain that voice. Perhaps the best way to maintain it is to work on it in portions. Many writers feel that their best work comes within the first hour of sitting down. You could work on the piece for an hour, then take a break. Come back, read through what you've written, and write some more. When you get to the revision stage, try reading the piece backwards, one paragraph at the time. This will help you to ascertain whether the voice you're using at the conclusion of the piece matches the beginning.
Now, as far as writing in second person is concerned, I think you need to work to make certain all the story elements are there. Using second person makes the reader almost the implied protagonist of the story. You've got to be careful not to take on a "choose your own adventure" sort of storytelling, where the main character is essentially a cipher. Help us, the reader, understand who the protagonist is.
I think you've set an interesting challenge for yourself, and if you'd like more feedback, I'd be happy to hear more!
TEAL DEER SIGHTING!
From:Re: TEAL DEER SIGHTING!
From:Re: TEAL DEER SIGHTING!
From:Re: TEAL DEER SIGHTING!
From:Re: TEAL DEER SIGHTING!
From:Re: TEAL DEER SIGHTING!
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 06:27 pm (UTC)http://shadowwolf13.livejournal.com/890277.html
no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 07:54 pm (UTC)I think this draft tells the bare bones of the story, but I also think you could make some improvements to get it across even more compellingly. First of all, I think the two-paragraph introduction is a bit of a distraction from the main story. While the language in it is vivid, I'd suggest working the best of those phrases into the actual storytelling, rather than delaying your story.
For me, your story really began to come alive about halfway through. Just for fun, see what happens if you begin with the paragraph "It was a hurt that speared through me and took my breath away." That would have you beginning with the real "meat" of the story. Then you could take the relevant details from what came before and work that in as flashbacks.
Even if you don't go that route, I would recommend being more specific about exactly what was going on between your (ex?) husband and this girl. It's not clear to the reader the nature of the problem. Lots of people have opposite-sex friends. Why was this friendship such an obvious cause for concern?
For me, the ending is problematic. How was the decision made to enter into a polyamorous relationship? How do the wedding vows come into the story? I found myself wondering if the "Lynn" mentioned was a different character from the husband or if they were two separate marriages. Also, the assertion that you've moved on and healed the cracks is not as powerful as it might be if you showed the reader, through specifics, how you had healed.
One of the most difficult things about writing from life is selecting which elements of the story to include. Perhaps this story doesn't need all of the details you've included in this draft, and perhaps that's what is leading to the confusion. I think you need to ask yourself "What's the essential story here?" and then focus on telling just that portion of it. The other aspects of your relationship/life experience can be told at another time.
I hope this has been helpful. Feel free to ask me follow-up questions or to run another draft by me.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 07:57 pm (UTC)I've written mine, but am not at all certain of it. I took the approach of cracking up - mental break down.
My uncertainty stems form a couple of things. I've worked the personal angle heavily in this competition and I think people get tired of the whole, "woe is me," thing.
additionally the voice is bitter and angry, which is probably not going to inspire positive feelings.
On the moon hand, it had to be written, even if I decide on something else or take a bye, this needed to come out, so there's that.
I'm hesitant to ask for criticism - showing weakness, fragile ego and all that, but you can't really improve if you don't ask for help, right?
http://locknkey.livejournal.com/110685.html
no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 09:59 pm (UTC)Your worries about the tone of the piece are valid concerns, because you don't want to alienate the reader. However, I think in this case, more than the tone, my observation is that it is very "inside." You need to open it up more for the reader: make it more clear what's going on. It's implied that there's marital strife, but it's not clear the source of it. Also, the title comes from the children's game, "step on a crack, break your mother's back," but it's not clear what role the child plays in this entry.
Much as I would normally caution against a meta-entry, where you reference the act of writing the entry, I actually think the few paragraphs at the end speak more powerfully than much of the rest of it. Perhaps that's because, as the child comes home, the feelings become more focused, more directed and factual.
If you want to be sure people don't dismiss this entry as another "woe is me" tale, my advice is to give the readers something that can bring the story home to them, to help them to feel what you felt as you wrote it. The last few paragraphs seem to indicate that your child does that for you. Perhaps you can focus more on the mother-child relationship throughout the piece and about how what's happening in the marriage could "break" it.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-17 08:42 am (UTC)That was one of the first things I thought of, too! I had so many ideas for this prompt, it was hard deciding what to go with.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 08:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 09:00 pm (UTC)I like your idea of writing a small portion one way and then consider whether it's better written the other way. You will probably be able to tell after just writing a paragraph or two if it's having the impact you desire.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 08:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 10:57 pm (UTC)One of my poetry instructors introduced me to a terrific book by Richard Hugo, "The Triggering Town," where he talks about the use of language in poetry. I think it relates to your situation, though, because he talks about how, when you know too much about a given place, you are compelled toward a drier retelling of it. I found one of the essays from the book (http://ualr.edu/rmburns/RB/hugotrig.html) online, and I think perhaps reading through it will help.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 09:25 pm (UTC)Or I can use my boyfriend's idea and write a story about a plumber.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 10:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 10:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 10:04 pm (UTC)Hmm... now I'm worried that this answer wasn't fun enough. Oh, bother. (BONKS SELF ON THE HEAD WITH A GIANT HAMMER)
no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 11:10 pm (UTC)I've certainly built up and then scrapped ideas in the past, but this is the first week in the competition where I finished a story, then trashed it. Wrote, edited, re-wrote, re-edited, and... pitched it.
Ugh!
After I was through the process, I realized it was WAY too personal, and I wasn't comfortable sharing it. I don't think I was expecting to hit a wall like that on LJI, but here I am! I think the whole "public post" thing has me a little weirded out for this part. It's something I've talked about in the past in locked entries, but I've never actually put this info out there.
Maybe advice on how to write stories with an emotional punch, while not putting oneself in vulnerable situations? Or maybe stories from others who ended up like I did?
I guess this is a "Where do I go from here?" post. :)
no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 11:42 pm (UTC)In season 5, I struggled with the "Sexual Healing" topic, because I tend to not write about sexual topics. But I decided to tackle the challenge anyway. Somehow, I managed to write a piece that dealt with my sexual history WITHOUT being overtly sexual. It's a piece that I don't mind having public, because I found a way to be true to the story without writing anything I felt uncomfortable about others seeing.
One of my writing instructors used to tell us, "Write what is hardest to say." The strongest poems, and the strongest pieces, often come from such moments.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-17 08:37 am (UTC)If someone (like me) is writing about a character, or characters, from a particular time period, do you think it's important to try and make them sound like they are from that time period? What if you don't know how they talked in that time period? I've done a little bit of research for the time period, but I'm worried the language is going to be tripping me up.
Alyce, since you're on my flist, I thought I'd go ahead and make a filtered post so you can see what I'm talking about with my entry this week: http://comedychick.livejournal.com/484722.html
(if anyone else on my flist wants to provide me with some feedback/thoughts this week before I post publicly, let me know and I can add you to the filter; it's another screenplay)
no subject
Date: 2011-02-17 02:52 pm (UTC)--Stay idiomatically within the time period. That is, don't use phrases that wouldn't exist because they reference anachronisms (like "What were you saying? I totally checked out!" in the 1700s).
--The same goes for slang.
--The only time this isn't true is if you are writing humor. Kate Beaton's humor is largely derived from using idiomatic and slang anachronisms to humorous effect.
But when you're talking about normal everyday sentence construction, there's a lot to be said for using normal, contemporary speech. It's the same as writing in accents: are you more likely to enjoy a book where a character's thick Jamaican accent is spelled out phonetically, or one where the character's speech is only peppered with a couple uniquely Jamaican idioms and you are told that he speaks with a thick Jamaican accent?
If you're writing something that takes place in a formal setting, you might want to use period formalized dialogue-- say, if it's a Regency story, having the characters speak formally to each other when they are at the Duchess' ball makes sense and can add the right feel to your story. But if it is a Regency story where the main characters are in a carriage on a stormy night, you should feel perfectly confident using normal contemporary speech.
To me, the same way that when you'd write a story that takes place in a non-English-speaking country, you wouldn't post the characters' dialogue in their language when writing for an English-speaking audience, it is perfectly acceptable to assume that period dialogue is being "translated" to make it understandable to contemporary audiences. On the other hand, if using real period dialogue adds to the flavor and feeling you want to get across in your story, it can sometimes add just the right zing!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-17 10:15 am (UTC)It was an excellent idea to bring in a guest coach. Mix things up. Get things circulating.
Looking forward to another challenging week.
Go get it!!!!
no subject
Date: 2011-02-17 09:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-18 02:58 am (UTC)I've started two different stories for the topic this week, and abandoned them both. They were each personal stories that related to the topic, and cute. But I reached the same conclusion both times, what was the point? Why would someone else want to read it? (I've noticed that if I have trouble figuring out how to end an entry it's not a good sign.)
I know I can write something for this week, but last week I went with the idea that was good enough and I don't want to do that again. Any suggestions on how to shake meaning out of an entry - or how to find it in general?
no subject
Date: 2011-02-18 03:20 am (UTC)You could also consider whether the story you're telling reminds you of anything else, perhaps a broader concern that would be worth exploring.
Or maybe you need to go back and figure out what the purpose of your piece is: to entertain, to persuade, to inform? Then make sure your entry delivers on that purpose.
One more thought: I think too often we try to tie everything up with a neat bow. Whether it's a poem, an essay or a story, we think we need a conclusion, a summary, a punchline. Between you and me, many pieces are stronger without them. Don't be afraid to give the reader a little bit of space to draw his or her own conclusions.
If you feel, on the other hand, that you're not done telling your story, maybe you should keep writing for a while and see what develops. You can go back and trim it down later.
I would be happy to read it and critique it if you'd like.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: