Links
- Season 1 Winner
- Season 2 Winner
- Season 3 Winner
- Season 4 Winner
- Season 5 Winner
- Season 6 Winner
- Season 7 Winner
- Season 8 Winner
- Season 9 Winner
- Season 10 Winner
- Exhibit A Winner
- Exhibit B Co-Winner
- Exhibit B Co-Winner
- Friends and Rivals Winner
- Agirlnamedluna
- Alexpgp
- Erica_crawford aka meirion
- Kittymichaels
- lee_hawk
- Walkertxkitty
- blueashke
- Your Host
- Go Shopping!
- Donate!
Active Entries
- 1: Week 4 - The Accusation
- 2: The Wheelhouse - Week 4
- 3: The Wheelhouse - Week 4 - Weekend Edition
- 4: Prompt - Week 4
- 5: Results - Week 3
- 6: The Wheelhouse - Week 3 - Weekend Edition
- 7: Week 3 - The Accusation
- 8: Vote - Week 3
- 9: Prompt - Week 3
- 10: The Wheelhouse - Week 3 - Extended Weekend Edition
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 12:39 am (UTC)How does human communication break when an intermediary is involved?
The inclination is to go digital because this seems to be a digital era problem, but we can really go wherever we want with it just as long as some breakdown of communication exists when a middle man or thing is involved. I would like to read about babel fish troubles, especially having to adjust the fish for best effect. (Edit: Thanks to Sobota (http://sobota.livejournal.com/463698.html) for getting me close enough. I wrote this before I read that.)
Which of these would be more interesting to read?
1.) A teacher faces complete and utter linguistic discombobulation as students slip into auto-aural-correct mode.
2.) The first American president living with muteness sends odd and surreal demands through his text-to-speech device.
3.) The promotional for the "Post Human" thought-to-action movement goes awry when the promoter's inner most thoughts are poorly translated.