ext_35784 (
clauderainsrm.livejournal.com) wrote in
therealljidol2014-06-06 11:14 am
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
The Killing Floor - Week 11
I'm going to open it back up to everyone this week. BUT I will ask that if you HAVE gone before, to wait 24 hours and if there is still one of the 5 spots available, go ahead and take it.
If you haven't though - this is a great chance to come in and get some of that good ole constructive criticism that you have been craving!
If you haven't though - this is a great chance to come in and get some of that good ole constructive criticism that you have been craving!
no subject
It's not that I want to see the characters fleshed out so much as—you have these interactions between Evangeline and the other people in the tattoo shop. Mark, I'm fine with—it's characters like Frank who seem to have been inserted almost to give comic relief and don't really 'gel' with the rest of the story. I don't think you need to flesh them out so much as think of what purpose they're serving. Are they a major part of the story? If they're not, then why do they get so much dialog? If this is Evangeline's story, then the crux of this first section should be on the interaction between her and Mark—and we don't need one-liners from Frank to cement that.
Regarding the Death and Jakob bits—perhaps I should have been clearer in what did vs. did not work for me in the story. I think that as it stands right now, the short, choppy bits you have that are Death/Jakob are clearly detracting from the story and are not doing what you intend them to do. They are what threw me out of the story the most and what ultimately made me go, "This has potential but isn't working as a cohesive whole yet." Yes, they're supposed to be short and jarring—I understood that their being short and choppy was deliberate, that this is something you are doing—but again, instead of working and making the reader go, "Wow, this is weird and uncomfortable and I want to know more about what's going on", they, to me, took me out of the story without doing anything to add to it. If the passages that were from Jakob's point of view had been more developed—less ambiguous (which I feel was likely also deliberate—my apologies if I'm wrong)—if they set it up and made it clear that he's someone the reader should be interested in, by virtue of making him interesting—less dark and mysterious and more fully realized and human—then they might work. It's similar to what I told
That's the difficulty of writing. If you can nail that, you'll manage the hook within the first 10K words, no problem—because people will be interested by the characters as well as by the central 'mystery' of the plot. You've got a plot that is interesting, and I want to see where you're going with it. My main "beef", so to speak, is that things don't hang together well, yet—but that's something that can be fixed with judicious editing.
no subject
You're coming through loud and clear. No worries. You don't like this first introduction and you don't care about the characters. No one is introduced for comic relief and all the characters figure in the story. It is a love story about Jakob and Evangeline, about a broken boy but a girl who is actually more broken. I think that needs to be arrived at and not explained in the first two scenes. I think sometimes we get too much exposition, the writer telling us how to perceive a character, rather than allowing the reader to make up their own mind. You say you don't care for Jakob - that's the effect that is intended. Evangeline is also not particularly likable. Mark and Death should be the only sympathetic characters at this point.
I understand that Death's voice isn't working for you. At all. And I appreciate you saying so! Believe me when I say that I'm taking your concrit and trying to "see" the story fresh!
What is my plot? And how is it more/less interesting?