ext_35784 (![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
clauderainsrm.livejournal.com) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
therealljidol2014-02-25 09:53 am
clauderainsrm.livejournal.com) wrote in therealljidol2014-02-25 09:53 am
Entry tags:
The Countdown - 6
I've been thinking about Michael Sam.
Because football is one of the internet's favorite things (being the extension of 80's teen movies), I'm sure everyone knows who I am talking about. If not, then you probably know him as "the first openly gay man in the NFL draft".
One of the things that I like about him is that after his statement, he's tried directing attention back to "how (he) plays". Because who he is attracted to really isn't a factor in how he will do on the field. Which is sort of the point of him coming out, to challenge an outdated stereotype and maybe give a few more players the courage to be who they actually are in a public forum.
The danger, of course, is that he will end up being another Tim Tebow. A guy who was a good college quarterback, but people hyped because of his being a conservative Christian. He did OK in the NFL, but he just wasn't starting quarterback material, and ended up being more trouble than he was worth... like many star college athletes who can't make the cut, he is now out of the NFL.
Religious groups, and people who really don't know a lot about football cried foul, saying that it was because he spoke his mind, that he was being persecuted for who he was. The people who watched his games, knew that once the opposing teams had seen some tape on him, he really couldn't offer much and didn't seem interested in learning.
Which brings me back to Michael Sam. He's on the small side to play defense in the league. Can he? That is to be determined. Other guys "his size" (if you saw him walking down the street, you wouldn't think he was a "little guy", it's only on a defensive line where that comes up) have certainly been able to make their mark. He's going to be tested, and some team is going to need the faith in his ability to grow in their system. That means not being a starter right away, and learning the game from the veterans.
I'm hoping that "The Left" gives him time and encouragement to actually do that, rather than go down the Tebow path and follow the example set by "The Right". Where "who is he" matters more than what he does on the field.
***
Speaking of the NFL, because again, the internet loves it... there is a proposed rule change to make "uttering racial slurs on the field" a 15 yard "unsportsmanlike conduct".
This is obviously fallout from the hazing/bullying case within the Miami Dolphin organization that has received a great deal of attention.
One of the things that was said was that they "have microphones all over the field". Which, last time I checked, wasn't true. The referees have them, and during big games you can have a couple players in the helmets. Maybe field mikes can pick up some of the stuff... but when was the last time you heard what players were saying to each other when they lined up facing each other? If this going to be a "if the Ref hears it?" Is it going to be "if someone complains?"
As a fan of the game, and of humanity as a whole, I like that the issue of racism is being taken seriously.
But this feels like it's more for show than to actually deal with an actual situation. I predict that the first time this is used to nullify a big play, in a crucial part of a game, that there will be an explosion from sports fans - and instead of making progress in our interactions with each other, that there will be a backlash against "being PC".
Especially after the last couple of seasons the NFL referees have had with blown calls and controversial decisions, you would hope that no one would be putting *more* decision-making over penalties into their hands. Especially when it comes to such an important everyday issue.
I'm hoping that the NFL can figure out how to change the culture that needs to be changed without distracting from the actual sport.
Because football is one of the internet's favorite things (being the extension of 80's teen movies), I'm sure everyone knows who I am talking about. If not, then you probably know him as "the first openly gay man in the NFL draft".
One of the things that I like about him is that after his statement, he's tried directing attention back to "how (he) plays". Because who he is attracted to really isn't a factor in how he will do on the field. Which is sort of the point of him coming out, to challenge an outdated stereotype and maybe give a few more players the courage to be who they actually are in a public forum.
The danger, of course, is that he will end up being another Tim Tebow. A guy who was a good college quarterback, but people hyped because of his being a conservative Christian. He did OK in the NFL, but he just wasn't starting quarterback material, and ended up being more trouble than he was worth... like many star college athletes who can't make the cut, he is now out of the NFL.
Religious groups, and people who really don't know a lot about football cried foul, saying that it was because he spoke his mind, that he was being persecuted for who he was. The people who watched his games, knew that once the opposing teams had seen some tape on him, he really couldn't offer much and didn't seem interested in learning.
Which brings me back to Michael Sam. He's on the small side to play defense in the league. Can he? That is to be determined. Other guys "his size" (if you saw him walking down the street, you wouldn't think he was a "little guy", it's only on a defensive line where that comes up) have certainly been able to make their mark. He's going to be tested, and some team is going to need the faith in his ability to grow in their system. That means not being a starter right away, and learning the game from the veterans.
I'm hoping that "The Left" gives him time and encouragement to actually do that, rather than go down the Tebow path and follow the example set by "The Right". Where "who is he" matters more than what he does on the field.
***
Speaking of the NFL, because again, the internet loves it... there is a proposed rule change to make "uttering racial slurs on the field" a 15 yard "unsportsmanlike conduct".
This is obviously fallout from the hazing/bullying case within the Miami Dolphin organization that has received a great deal of attention.
One of the things that was said was that they "have microphones all over the field". Which, last time I checked, wasn't true. The referees have them, and during big games you can have a couple players in the helmets. Maybe field mikes can pick up some of the stuff... but when was the last time you heard what players were saying to each other when they lined up facing each other? If this going to be a "if the Ref hears it?" Is it going to be "if someone complains?"
As a fan of the game, and of humanity as a whole, I like that the issue of racism is being taken seriously.
But this feels like it's more for show than to actually deal with an actual situation. I predict that the first time this is used to nullify a big play, in a crucial part of a game, that there will be an explosion from sports fans - and instead of making progress in our interactions with each other, that there will be a backlash against "being PC".
Especially after the last couple of seasons the NFL referees have had with blown calls and controversial decisions, you would hope that no one would be putting *more* decision-making over penalties into their hands. Especially when it comes to such an important everyday issue.
I'm hoping that the NFL can figure out how to change the culture that needs to be changed without distracting from the actual sport.
no subject
no subject
*wink*
no subject
no subject
The challenge of talking about important issues without distracting from the competition itself.
That's definitely something that has come up in the past.
no subject
Honestly, I don't know how they'd be able to enforce something like slurs on the field unless every player wore a mic, and I could see it easily getting into murky territory when one slur isn't called but another is.
no subject
Considering the NFL policy against bashing the league in the media, I wonder what the fall out of that happening will be with players directly impacted by something that was missed on social media.
no subject
no subject
The start of the new season got me thinking about older seasons and various things that have come up.
One of the more difficult moments (for me) have come when there are two contestants engaging each other when I end up agreeing with one of them on the issue at hand. (and especially when I extremely disagree with the other one)
But I have to let them play it out, because the game isn't about that issue, and if someone makes themselves out to be an idiot the voters tend to send that message pretty clearly.
People do get upset with me for not intervening though, which usually means pissing off people that I actually agree with!
Which is what reminded me of the NFL rule change proposal - something that I would normally agree with that I see a lot of problems with how it might be implemented.
no subject
no subject
no subject
The NFL has been tweaking things over the years to lessen collisions and (of course) protect Tom Brady. ;)
It makes me curious where things are heading for the sport.
no subject
no subject
Those Romans were WAY ahead of their time, if you ask me.
no subject
no subject
But that is a lot of the game - it's how people get invested in it. It's a fun parallel to Idol (and yeah, I do see what you're doing there). Shouldn't it be about the writing, after all? Of course. And it is. Just like in football, you can't score if you fumble the ball (or the words). But people pay more attention and care about you getting the ball into the end zone if you engage with them, and thus it becomes more than just the game as defined by the rules.
Still dithering, btw. Dither dither dither....
no subject
*dithers with you*
no subject
I always appreciate company while dithering. Dither dither dither.... though I suspect we're dithering over different things. You're definitely playing, yes?
no subject
It's amusing as long as people don't go inside of Idol entries and start changing them!!
no subject
I'm not dithering about playing, you are correct about that - I *will* be signing up ASAP, as I *must* reach my 100 Weeks mark, as I'm at 99 now since the Exhibit weeks don't count towards weeks played!
no subject
Did you see my announcement? I've officially opened Season 9 to previous winners. So there isn't even that argument anymore! :)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
It's kind of awesome having this sort of choice to make, a sort of heads-I-win tails-I-win situation. We'll see... we'll see...
no subject
Then it can be a group exercise! :D
Everyone wins! But mostly me!
no subject
Waiting for answers is hard. I may just assume I'm not getting in (a prettttty damn safe assumption from where I'm sitting right now) and sign-up for Idol if I haven't heard by the third.
no subject
no subject
Edit: rereading some emails I see that it actually says "you will be notified by the end of March". Double argh.
no subject
Since you probably won't hear back until the end of March, you can either a) Sign up anyway, then drop out if needed - we will only be in maybe week 3 by then, so there won't have been too many eliminated (maybe) by that point, or b) Wait and see if there is a Second Chance sign-up, and do that if you get a negative response.
no subject
no subject
That said, I think it'd be pretty cool for someone (not that I'm pointing fingers here (but I mean you specifically)) to "legitimize" the Exhibits by going through and cleaning the clocks of all those people who keep saying "Those weren't real seasons" by, y'know, winning. :-)
no subject
no subject
no subject
And I agree, the Exhibits were legit. But (to tie back into the original topic) h8ers gotta h8. (See? I'm topical!)
no subject
The people who WANT to go into writing, tend to do really well after playing Idol and get too busy to come back.
Fortunately, we also have a lot of people who just want to write for the sake of writing! Those people are awesome, because they come for the fun and keep coming back!
no subject
1. Soylent green is people. Tasty, tasty people.
no subject
Football and football culture fascinates me but I could never, ever really dedicate the time to fully understand it. In the end, if the kid can play, the kid can play, and that's all that should matter to people.
The bit about slurs just makes me feel uneasy, if only because it'll open up a whole world of "What is and isn't a slur," and enforcement issues, etc. I doubt that is going to end well.
no subject
Exactly.
If you can't play though, it shouldn't matter if people really, really want you to be good because you are in their demographic. *cough* Tebow /*cough*
no subject
There are definitely some grey areas here.
no subject
But can they really police it fairly in a way that won't just make things extremely complicated? I am not envious of the refs who'll have to enforce it, if it passes. Not at all.
no subject
But that seems like something that can be done on an organizational level, with each of the teams cracking down on things internally. I hope they do a lot more of that.
Putting the emphasis on the field, during a game, creates a whole different thing that is going to involve a lot of subjectivity (usually unsportsmanlike conduct involves someone throwing a punch or taunting, both easy to recognize).
no subject
no subject
There are highs and lows in any group.
no subject
Still can't decide whether to play or not. I am writing well at the moment, but I have so much stress in my life that I am wary about adding any more... I guess I'll just see how I feel come Monday.
no subject
I'll ask someone to make sure.
*confers with self*
*nods* Yep, you want to do it.
no subject